Tag: claim denials

With millions of healthcare claims to process and millions of dollars at stake each month, getting claims right the first time is a top performance indicator for healthcare providers. The administrative burden is immense – there are more than a thousand health payers, each with their own requirements, edits and software. Each claim must be scrubbed to make sure every last detail is correct before it's submitted – or the result will be delayed payments and lost revenue. By taking this resource-intensive activity off providers' hands, medical billing clearinghouses are often the “most valuable player” of healthcare claims management. Choosing the right medical claims clearinghouse could make or break a provider's claims management success. What is a medical claims clearinghouse? Healthcare clearinghouses help providers increase reimbursement rates by checking each claim before it's submitted to the payer. They scrub for errors and omissions, then reformat the data to meet the specific requirements of each payer. Once a claim is cleared, the clearinghouse transmits the electronic claim (the “837 file”) to the appropriate commercial or government payer using a secure connection, in line with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). The payer evaluates the claim and communicates acceptance or rejection to the clearinghouse. If payment is due, the payer will issue a reimbursement check with an Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statement. Rejected claims may be resubmitted once any corrections have been made. This sounds like a simple process, but it's extremely complex. Tracking and adapting to individual payer edits, state insurance regulations, and multiple software systems call for a level of expertise and industry insight that would be challenging for in-house teams to maintain efficiently. With a singular focus on claims routing and the quirks of individual payer adjudication workflows, healthcare clearinghouses are often better placed to streamline electronic claims submissions. What services do clearinghouses help with? A healthcare clearinghouse can typically offer: Claims processing: Managing the submission, processing, and tracking of medical claims electronically to insurance payers. Denial management: Handling denied claims by identifying the reasons for denial, correcting errors, and resubmitting claims for reimbursement. Real-time eligibility verification: Verifying patients' insurance coverage and eligibility in real time to ensure accurate billing and reduce claim denials. Electronic data interchange (EDI): Facilitating the electronic exchange of healthcare data between healthcare providers and insurance payers in standardized formats. Electronic remittance advice (ERA) processing: Receiving and processing electronic remittance advice from insurance payers to reconcile payments and denials with submitted claims. Claim scrubbing: Checking claims for errors, inaccuracies, and missing information before submission to reduce the likelihood of claim denials. Coordination of benefits (COB) verification: Identifying primary and secondary insurance coverage for patients with multiple insurance plans to ensure accurate billing and reimbursement. Claim status inquiry and reporting: Providing tools and services to track the status of submitted claims and generate reports on claim processing metrics. Compliance and regulatory support: Ensuring compliance with healthcare regulations, such as HIPAA, and staying updated on changes in billing requirements and coding standards. Provider enrollment: Helping healthcare providers enroll with insurance payers and update their provider information as needed. Appeals management: Assisting healthcare providers in appealing denied claims through proper documentation and communication with insurance payers. EDI connectivity and integration: Offering connectivity solutions and integration services to seamlessly exchange data between healthcare providers' practice management systems and the clearinghouse platform. Customer support and training: Providing ongoing support and training to healthcare providers and their staff on using the clearinghouse platform effectively and resolving issues related to claims processing and reimbursement Why work with a medical claims clearinghouse? The answer lies in the growing problem of denied claims. Denials dent provider profits through lost revenue and time wasted on reworking claims. A 2021 KFF study of in-network claims found that 18% were denied because they were for excluded services, 9% because of missing prior authorization or referrals, and 72% because of “other reasons.” This likely includes incorrect patient encounter codes, incomplete patient or physician information, or other data entry errors. Too many denials arise from avoidable human error. Providers can ill-afford an inefficient claims management workflow. Direct submissions require staff to repeat the same data entry tasks repeatedly, using multiple software accounts. Monitoring claims status without a centralized system is messy. And with ongoing staffing pressures, many providers don't have the resources or infrastructure to attempt this anyway. The savings of a direct-to-payer approach are soon outweighed by higher denial rates. Healthcare clearinghouses can ease the burden on in-house RCM teams, smooth friction between providers and payers, and provide industry intelligence to streamline claims submissions. By partnering with a medical claims clearinghouse, providers don't just save time and staff resources, but increase the likelihood of claims being submitted right the first time. The importance of choosing a clearinghouse that stays compliant Complying with industry regulations helps healthcare providers avoid costly fines and reputational damage. Compliance rules ensure adherence to stringent regulations like HIPAA, which safeguards patient data privacy and confidentiality, ensuring that all data handling practices comply with the highest standards. A compliant clearinghouse implements robust security measures like encryption and access controls to protect sensitive information during EDI. Staying compliant fosters trust among stakeholders, including patients, healthcare providers, and insurance payers. It demonstrates a commitment to ethical practices and upholds industry standards, promoting long-term relationships and sustainability in the always-evolving healthcare field. What to look for when choosing a medical billing clearinghouse? Here are five features to look out for when choosing the right medical billing clearinghouse partner: 1. Usability “Is this medical claims clearinghouse going to be easy to work with? Do they have a user-friendly interface?” Given that a significant motivation behind working with a medical claims clearinghouse is to make the claims process easier, the first question to ask is how easy they'll be to work with. The ideal clearinghouse partner will offer a streamlined user experience with an intuitive online claims dashboard or interface so that all claims can be managed in one place. Inevitably, issues that need to be checked by the provider's medical billing team will crop up. The clearinghouse should offer clear communication channels and protocols for verifying, correcting, and adding any missing information or documentation. Ideally, the clearinghouse's interface will provide at-a-glance error reports and updates on the status of each claim, to minimize delays and allow staff to report on progress. The clearinghouse should also offer staff training and real-time support for fast and effective implementation. Medical billing teams don't want to spend hours chasing up queries, so investigating call center support protocols and response times is a smart move. Some of the standard add-on services that make the medical claims clearinghouse more user-friendly include: Training materials: The clearinghouse should offer comprehensive training sessions, to empower healthcare providers and staff with the knowledge and skills to utilize the platform effectively. Customer service: The clearinghouse should pride itself on delivering exceptional customer service tailored to its users' unique needs and challenges. A dedicated support team is available via phone and email to promptly address inquiries, troubleshoot issues, and provide personalized assistance. Their responsive and knowledgeable approach ensures that users receive timely support and guidance whenever they require assistance. Also, look for a medical claims clearinghouse with security and privacy features to keep patient data safe. For example: Data encryption: All data transmitted through the clearinghouse platform should be encrypted using industry-standard protocols, safeguarding sensitive information from unauthorized access during transmission Access controls: Role-based access controls limit user access to specific features and functionalities based on their role and responsibilities within the healthcare organization, reducing the risk of unauthorized data access and misuse. Audit trails: Comprehensive audit trails track and record all user activities within the platform, enabling administrators to monitor and review user actions for compliance and security purposes. The medical claims clearinghouse should conduct periodic security audits and assessments to identify and address potential vulnerabilities and ensure ongoing compliance with industry regulations and best practices. Data redundancy and disaster recovery: Robust data redundancy measures and disaster recovery plans are in place to protect against data loss or corruption, ensuring continuity of service and minimizing downtime in the event of unforeseen incidents or emergencies. Confidentiality agreements: All staff members undergo training on data privacy and security practices and sign confidentiality agreements, reinforcing their commitment to protecting the confidentiality and privacy of patient information. 2. Reach and scope “Does this medical claims clearinghouse connect to all our regular payers? Will we need to engage additional clearinghouses for specific cases?” To leverage the advantages of outsourcing claims processing, providers must check that the clearinghouse can handle their specific claims mix and list their most-billed payers. Healthcare clearinghouses often specialize in different types of claims, such as in-patient, out-patient, dental, pharmacy, and so on, so this will likely be a quick way to narrow down the options. Similarly, some operate only in certain regions, and if the provider needs to submit claims to payers outside that area, they're going to need another clearinghouse. In most cases, choosing a clearinghouse with a broad reach and national scope will be beneficial so that all claims can be handled by a single vendor. If the provider plans to use the clearinghouse for Medicaid submissions, they'll also want to check that their partner is set up to do this in line with state requirements. Providers should also consider what services they need from their clearinghouse: submitting electronic claims? Verifying patient eligibility and coverage? Checking the status of claims and receiving ERAs? Some clearinghouses will perform all these functions, while others focus on one or two areas. 3. Error rates “What are the clearinghouse's average rejection rates? How can we accelerate corrections?” Minimizing billing errors is the key to reducing rejections and denials. When discussing program components with a potential clearinghouse partner, providers should look for features that minimize errors, such as checks for duplicate information, missing attachments and coding discrepancies. A dashboard that flags any potential issues means errors can be found and fixed immediately, rather than being discovered weeks later. To complement this process, providers should also consider what in-house actions could further reduce the risk of errors. Running internal checks with automated tools such as Claim Scrubber can ensure claims are in good shape before they're sent to the clearinghouse. Claim Scrubber reviews every line of pre-billed claims and verifies patient information coding entries before being sent on. General and payer-specific edits can be checked to increase first-time pass rates. Automated Prior Authorizations and Insurance Eligibility Verification tools offer another layer of extra checks, by verifying eligibility at each stage of the patient's healthcare journey. 4. Affordability “How are the clearinghouse's contracts structured? Are there extra fees to watch out for?” Providers will want to find a reasonably priced clearinghouse. Some charge a fixed monthly fee, while others charge a variable fee based on the volume of claims each month. Providers with relatively low claims should choose the first option. Eligibility checks, claim status updates and remittance receipts are likely to be charged separately, so these should also be factored into contract discussions. Because the rules around claims submissions often change, providers should avoid being locked into long-term contracts, and clarify the termination arrangements. Using a medical claims clearinghouse offers several financial benefits for healthcare providers: Faster reimbursement: Clearinghouses streamline the claims submission process, reducing the time it takes to submit and process claims. This results in quicker reimbursement from insurance payers, improving cash flow for healthcare organizations. Reduced claim denials: Healthcare clearinghouses employ claim scrubbing technology to identify and correct errors before submission, reducing the likelihood of claim denials. These solutions help minimize the need for costly appeals and resubmissions, saving time and resources. Improved efficiency: Automating manual tasks and providing electronic solutions for claims processing lets clearinghouses increase operational efficiency within healthcare organizations. Staff can focus on patient care instead of administrative tasks, optimizing productivity and reducing labor costs. Lowered administrative costs: Clearinghouses offer a centralized platform for managing claims and interacting with insurance payers, streamlining administrative processes and reducing administrative overhead costs associated with paper-based systems. Access to reporting analytics: Clearinghouses often provide analytics and reporting tools that offer insights into claim submission trends, denial rates, and reimbursement patterns. Healthcare providers can use this data to identify areas for improvement and optimize revenue cycle management strategies. Negotiation power with payers: Clearinghouses provide valuable data and analytics that healthcare providers can use during contract negotiations with insurance payers. Access to comprehensive claim data and performance metrics strengthens providers' negotiating position, potentially leading to more favorable reimbursement rates. It's also worth considering how partnering with a clearinghouse that integrates with other claims management solutions can deliver cost savings elsewhere in the revenue cycle, through optimized workflows and greater efficiency. 5. Integrated services “How does this service fit within our broader revenue cycle management (RCM) activities?” Claims management doesn't happen in isolation: everything from the patient billing experience to internal denials management should work together to improve the entire revenue cycle. It's important to look for a clearinghouse that can integrate with other RCM tools to improve first-pass rates and shorten payment cycles. Some clearinghouses can receive electronic remittance advice (ERA) and even automate payments, which could help providers get paid faster and further reduce the administrative load on staff. Clearinghouses can also integrate with a provider's electronic medical record and medical billing software to plug any gaps before claims are submitted. This integration ensures that accurate and up-to-date patient information is included in claims, reducing errors and denials. Additionally, clearinghouses may offer tools or APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) that allow EHR systems to transmit claims data directly to the clearinghouse platform, eliminating the need for manual data entry and improving efficiency. Clearinghouses should also integrate with practice management (PMS) systems to streamline claims submission. This interoperability enables a seamless transfer of patient and billing information from the PMS to the clearinghouse platform, automating claim generation and submission. Clearinghouses may even provide real-time claim status updates and remittance advice directly within the PMS. As noted, providers can accelerate claims and denial management by leveraging tools such as Claim Scrubber and ClaimSource. These tools draw on Experian Health's unrivaled dataset and analytics platforms, and integrate with Experian Health's other RCM solutions to verify and automate the information being added to each claim. Experian's patient identity solutions can also be used to keep patient data safe and secure, and cross-check demographic information to prevent hold-ups and streamline the entire process. Technological Trends and Innovations Technological advancements, particularly artificial intelligence (AI), are transforming claims denials management. AI-powered algorithms can analyze vast datasets to identify patterns, predict claim outcomes, and optimize workflows. These solutions enable healthcare providers to choose clearinghouses based on performance metrics, such as claim acceptance rates and denial management capabilities. By harnessing AI, clearinghouses offer unparalleled accuracy, speed, and intelligence, empowering healthcare organizations to maximize revenue and streamline healthcare operations. Glossary of Clearinghouse Terms Clearinghouse: A third-party entity that acts as an intermediary between healthcare providers and payers (insurance companies or government agencies) to facilitate the electronic processing of medical claims. EDI (Electronic Data Interchange): The electronic exchange of structured data between computer systems, used by clearinghouses to transmit medical claims data between providers and payers. HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act): Federal legislation that sets standards for protecting and securing patients' health information, including electronic transactions such as those handled by medical claims clearinghouses. Claim Submission: The process of sending a request for reimbursement for healthcare services rendered to a patient to the payer through the clearinghouse. Claim Validation: The process of verifying the completeness and accuracy of medical claims data before submission to the payer, helping to reduce errors and denials. EDI Enrollment: The process by which healthcare providers register with a clearinghouse to exchange electronic data, including setting up connectivity and establishing secure transmission protocols. Rejection: When a submitted medical claim does not meet the requirements or standards set by the payer, resulting in a refusal to process the claim for reimbursement. Error Code: A numeric or alphanumeric code provided by the clearinghouse or payer to indicate the reason for a claim rejection, facilitating troubleshooting and correction of the issue. Electronic Remittance Advice: A document sent by the payer to the healthcare provider detailing the status of processed claims, including payment information and explanations for any denials or adjustments. Claim Status Inquiry: The process of querying the clearinghouse or payer to obtain information on the current status of a submitted medical claim, such as whether it has been received, processed, or paid. Claim Resubmission: The process of correcting and re-submitting a rejected or denied medical claim for reconsideration and processing by the payer. Batch Processing: The method clearinghouses use to handle multiple medical claims simultaneously, typically in large batches, to increase efficiency and reduce processing time. Payer List: A directory maintained by the clearinghouse containing information about the insurance companies and government agencies with which it interfaces for medical claims processing, including contact details and electronic submission requirements. Learn more about how Experian Health's medical claims clearinghouse and claims management solutions can help providers simplify and accelerate claims processing for faster payments and fewer denials.

Medical billing is the first line of defense against claims denials. However, medical billing errors cost U.S. healthcare systems approximately $935 million weekly. Not only do preventable errors wreak havoc on providers' revenue cycle, but patients say they're frustrated at the time spent correcting these errors—45% spend up to one month on the back and forth between payers and provider billing teams. Better medical billing software can automate claims management at the beginning of the reimbursement process and eliminate the traditionally labor-intensive processes plagued by human errors. Medical billing software can also make it easier for patients to pay and understand their coverage eligibility for fewer surprises after their care encounter. This article discusses how healthcare providers can implement these tools and set the stage for a better revenue cycle, happier patients, and more efficient care delivery. Common problems with medical billing Experian Health's State of Claims 2022 report showed healthcare denials increasing substantially each year. Some of the most common medical billing errors include: Medical coding transforms a healthcare service deliverable into reimbursable revenue. Yet Experian Health data shows that 42% of providers say inaccuracies in coding reporting lead to frequent claims denials. Coding errors delay reimbursement and, at worst, increase the risk of health system fraud, abuse fines, or even impact patient care with an incorrect diagnostic code. Patient information errors, including missing or incomplete prior authorizations, are among the top three reasons for claim denials. Even a misspelled name or date of birth can cause the claim to return to the provider for correction. Problems with outdated medical records and manual data entry exacerbate these issues. While each provider and payer has unique claims denial numbers to share, Medicare reports that the average volume of errors is just over 7%. Yet providers can't take all the blame for the volume of clerical errors given the complexities of ICD-10 requirements. Medical Economics explains, “The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced 395 new diagnosis codes, 25 deletions and 13 revisions for the fiscal year (FY) 2024 ICD-10 CM code set.” Medical billing software is critical for preventing healthcare claims denials by keeping up with these complexities and avoiding human errors. What can the latest round of automated, artificial intelligence (AI) powered software do for the average healthcare provider? Prevent claims denials with better medical billing software Experian Health's Patient Access Curator solution heads off claims denials before they happen. The solution incorporates AI to improve the accuracy of claims management at patient registration and billing. The system leverages logic that returns multiple data points from a single inquiry in 30 seconds - streamlining benefits coordination, lessening patient identifier errors, and spotting “hidden” eligibility. Some of the benefits include: Faster and more accurate eligibility verification - Legacy medical billing software operates from a clearinghouse model. However, these tools often miss active, billable coverage and require extensive manual workflows to edit claims and appeals. AI eliminates the standard by-hand workarounds correlated with traditional billing software. Better coordination of benefits (COB) - COB denials are common in healthcare. Many patients do not understand the intricacies of government and commercial coverages and how they interact. Patient Access Curator can help. When integrated into the registration eligibility verification process, this AI-powered tool can lessen or eliminate COB denials by identifying hidden payer coverage requirements that outdated software cannot find. Additionally, the software can trigger automatic inquiries to third parties to verify active coverage quickly. Streamlines MBI conversions - How much time do providers spend tracking down Medicare Beneficiary Identifiers during patient registration? The complicating factor is that MBIs change without warning; many patients and providers find out after the payor rejects the claim. Providers can eliminate this frustration by adding software that automatically updates MBIs in real-time. No more searching websites, calling patients—or reworking the claim. Increases accuracy of patient demographic data - The quality of healthcare data can begin to erode at registration. Incorrect or obsolete patient data is a challenge for the entire industry. It makes sense that up-to-date, accurate patient demographic information improves their experience. Providers can eliminate obsolete or incorrect patient data with better medical billing software to lessen claims denials. Patient Access Curator automatically updates outdated information for cleaner claims and more accurate data. Automates coverage and financial verification for increased accuracy - Patients and providers benefit from AI automation that accurately identifies payment details. The solution is particularly beneficial for spotting missed revenue opportunities for self-pay, unbillable, or patients with unspecified payer status records. Patient Access Curator also identifies each customer's ability and propensity to pay, increasing the likelihood of successful revenue capture later while maintaining patient satisfaction and comfort. Reimbursement accuracy, staff efficiency, and patient satisfaction all stem from better medical billing software. Patient Access Curator offers healthcare providers a way to turn claims management into denials prevention. These tools apply a proactive, preventative automated process with artificial intelligence to increase downstream revenue by reducing claims denials. Experian Health, ranked Best in KLAS in Claims Management, Clearinghouse, and Revenue Cycle Contract Management for 2024, is the leading provider of technology solutions to improve healthcare reimbursement. Experian Health solutions have helped many healthcare providers obliterate claims denials. In 2023, the organization acquired Wave HDC, an AI-powered healthcare data curation solution leveraging the latest AI technology innovations for a better revenue cycle. To find out more, contact Experian Health today.

“As the IU Health Revenue Cycle team rallied to respond to the claims processing disruption, we were uniquely positioned with our long-time Experian partnership to quickly re-institute critical claims routines and restore a significant volume of claims transmissions.  This would not have been possible without Experian's nimble and comprehensive approach, immediately applying talented and committed resources that leveraged existing Experian platform infrastructure.” – Bryan Daniels, Vice President Revenue Cycle Solutions, IU Health Challenge Indiana University Health (IU Health) is the largest network of physicians in Indiana comprised of over 38,000 team members and 2,717 available beds. Based in Indianapolis, Indiana, the organization has dozens of facilities statewide and is on a mission to make the state one of the healthiest in the nation. In February 2024, IU Health found itself impacted by the cybersecurity incident so many providers across the country abruptly faced. They were unable to send claims to insurance companies and their revenue cycle operations came to screeching halt. Knowing they needed a trusted solution fast, the revenue cycle leadership team asked Experian Health if they could help. Solution Conversations advanced quickly and the Experian Health team was able to implement its Best in KLAS ClaimSource® platform within a week. ClaimSource is an innovative claims management solution designed for scalability and improves revenue streams by minimizing denials. By using automation, it boosts operational efficiency by prioritizing claims, payments, and denials, allowing users to tackle high-impact accounts promptly. Outcome Thanks to ClaimSource, IU Health achieved the following results: Accelerated $632 million in claims transmissions in the first five days of business. Processed $1.1B of claims backlog by March 27.  “We value our longstanding partnership with IU Health and it's very rewarding that we were able to help in a very critical situation,” said Jason Considine, Experian Health's Chief Commercial Officer. “We know IU Health places the utmost importance on patient care, and being an important part of our client's solution to deliver on their service commitment is reflective of our service commitment to simplify healthcare.” Learn more about how ClaimSource can help your healthcare organization accelerate cash flow, reduce denials and optimize efficiency.

Healthcare leaders often zero in on how uninsured rates affect their bottom line. But another patient group presents a quieter financial dilemma for providers: those with multiple active health plans. In these cases, it's important to ensure each plan pays the right amount – in the right order. Should any confusion arise, providers may end up with their claims being denied, resulting in underpayments. This is where the coordination of benefits (COB) process comes in. What is coordination of benefits (COB) and why is it important? When a patient is covered by more than one plan, the “coordination of benefits” process kicks in to help health plans figure out their respective payment responsibilities. With patients often having multiple insurance policies, ensuring that each policy pays its share is vital. The purpose of coordination of benefits is to prevent overpayment or duplication of benefits, ensuring that the total benefits paid do not exceed the actual cost of the service received. Integrating a digital COB solution within registration and scheduling workflows can help providers ensure they bill primary and secondary payers correctly, preventing unnecessary claim denials. Challenges of coordination of benefits  Coordination of Benefits is a pivotal aspect of RCM, but it's not without its hurdles. Here's a look at the complexities that often arise:  Overlapping Policies: Determining which policy pays first can be confusing. Patients with dual coverage might not always be aware of the hierarchy, leading to billing complications. And many legacy systems only select the primary, without consideration for secondary or tertiary. And regional plans add another layer of complexity.  Claim Denials: Incorrect coordination of benefits can lead to claim denials or overpayments. This not only affects revenue but also strains the patient-provider relationship when patients are billed incorrectly.  Administrative Burden: Manual COB verification is time-consuming and prone to errors. Staff often spend hours cross-referencing policies, which could be better spent on patient care.  Coordination of benefits: the dream vs. reality In an ideal world, patients would register for care weeks ahead of their scheduled treatment. During the registration process, they would inform the provider of all their active insurance coverage, with correct and complete details close to hand. No plan would go unmentioned, and no policy number misplaced. Registration staff would quickly enter the information into their EMR without error, so coverage could be verified in real-time. The reality is far different. Recent findings show that 65% of consumers struggle to understand what their health insurance covers. They do not carry copies of their insurance cards. They may not be aware that they are covered under a relative's health plan. Patient access teams are under-staffed and over-stretched, with little time to ask guiding questions that would uncover additional insurance. Coordination of benefits efforts should start as soon as it becomes apparent that a patient has active coverage under multiple plans. Unfortunately, the messy reality of coverage discovery and patient registration means patients and providers are left in the dark until a claim is denied. The payer rejects the claim for a COB-related reason, leaving billers with no clue how to resolve it. The problem gets worse from there. Automating coordination of benefits for faster, cleaner claims As with all aspects of healthcare billing, there are many complex rules and regulations governing COB transactions. Under HIPAA, health plans and payers (including Medicare and Medicaid) must coordinate benefits for each patient and determine the primary and secondary payers. Tracking this manually is extremely challenging for providers: using the information provided by the patient (which may or may not be accurate), staff would contact each payer by phone or email to verify coverage. They would then review the COB rules and guidelines for each health plan to determine the primary payer and follow specific rules for billing secondary payers. It's no wonder that COB transactions are now among the most automated administrative tasks. Automating coordination of benefits not only saves staff time, but also increases the chances of finding all active coverage, collating complete insurance profiles for the patient, and making an accurate primacy determination. Digital systems also make it easier for providers and payers to communicate with one another, facilitating smoother dispute resolution and regulatory compliance. Patient Access Curator brings real-time COB to EH clients In late 2023, Experian Health acquired Wave HDC, bringing clients a new and unrivalled package of real-time coverage and benefits solutions based on AI-powered data curation. This new solution, Patient Access Curator, helps healthcare billing teams prevent claim denials in seconds through real-time data analysis. This includes COB curation, which automatically analyzes payer responses to identify hidden cues that staff cannot see. If other insurance is identified, the tool alerts the user and triggers additional queries to verify active coverage and build a complete insurance profile for the patient. Each policy is then analyzed further to determine the patient's primary, secondary and tertiary coverage, reliably sifting out any non-billable coverage. Since 2020, the technology powering Patient Access Curator has prevented denials amounting to more than $1 billion. Integrating coordination of benefits automation yields savings throughout the revenue cycle Integrating COB automation with other RCM tools, such as coverage discovery and eligibility verification, means providers can prevent and manage denials in a single workflow. Doing this during patient registration allows teams to resolve issues in the early stages of the revenue cycle, rather than wait to deal with them once claims are denied. While catching errors on the front-end results in faster patient registration and clean claims first time, the tool adds value later in the revenue cycle, too. Streamlining the correction process prevents revenue loss and reduces the need for manual intervention. Here's how these use cases look in practice: In one multistate practice, the technology automated COB curation with insurance verification during patient registration. This enabled primary coverage corrections for 12% of patient registrations and identified undocumented Medicare and Medicaid coverages for 6% of registrations. Left unchecked, these omissions would have resulted in denials, delays, and missed revenue opportunities. The technology was deployed in the denials workflow at a large health system, where it identified COB corrections for 92% of all COB denials. Of these, 60% were immediately refiled to the correct primary payer, minimizing delays in revenue recovery. In the remaining claims, the tool found evidence of inaccurate or outdated third-party liability records within payer claim adjudication systems. Providers urgently need revenue cycle processes to be as efficient and reliable as possible – especially when dealing with patients with multiple, complex health plans. A powerful denial prevention solution that slots neatly into the registration workflow means they can maximize revenue with minimal human intervention. And with accurate results delivered in seconds, Patient Access Curator could be just what the doctor ordered. Get in touch today to find out more about coordination of benefits automation and discuss other ways to increase efficiency on the front-end of the revenue cycle, using Patient Access Curator.

Labor shortages and the uptick in claim denials are undoubtedly putting heavy financial strain on healthcare providers. Could automated claim denial prevention help ease the pressure? In a recent webinar, Jason Considine, Chief Commercial Officer at Experian Health, and Jordan Levitt, Co-founder at Wave HDC (recently acquired by Experian Health), discussed strategies to tackle denials head-on in the coming year. This article summarizes the key insights, including a new automated one-click denial prevention tool that shifts denials management to the front end of the revenue cycle. 5 revenue cycle challenges causing claim denials and strained margins To start, Considine opened the webinar with a discussion of the root causes of denials. These often originate during registration, and for many providers, “registration and data integrity continue to be a problem.” A fifth of denials are attributed to just five key issues: Coordination of benefits (COB) denials, which account for a major portion of denials as more patients have secondary and tertiary coverage; Contingency fees, which eat up margins in exchange for information that providers should be able to obtain themselves during registration; Labor costs, which can increase with labor-saving automations that push manual input downstream; Epic plan mapping, which becomes increasingly complex and error-prone as payer requirements evolve; Transactional pricing, where “pay-per-click” pricing models disincentivize providers from using registration tools to find patient information during registration. These interrelated issues should be solved with one up-front revenue cycle management (RCM) solution, rather than piecemeal fixes that are implemented later. According to Considine: “Vendors tend to offer ways to solve these problems after the patient leaves, but really we should have gotten the right information right up front. Pushing problem-solving downstream means you need more people to manage these solutions, you've got more vendors to manage, and you end up staffing denial management departments and throwing more people at the problem.” Shifting from denial management to denial prevention Part of the challenge is the sheer volume of patient information that must be collected from the start. Staff interact with multiple systems to collate, check and coordinate data on eligibility, COB, Medicare Beneficiary Identifiers, demographics and coverage. Many of these data points can be points of failure if the wrong information is captured and penetrates the rest of the system. This makes patient access the perfect place to solve the denials problem. Levitt says this is exactly what Wave HDC set out to do when they developed the technology that underpins Patient Access Curator. “The answer isn't multiple clicks, running one transaction at a time. With Patient Access Curator, you can know everything about the patient to run a clean revenue cycle process and propagate only clean data downstream, all within two to thirty seconds.” Patient Access Curator prevents denials by capturing all patient data at registration through a single click solution that returns multiple results in less than a minute. It's fast because the underlying code acts like a Rosetta Stone, automatically translating the language of the user and the health system into the terms required by the payer. This means data can be transferred easily between interfaces. Levitt explained how the tool builds a “perimeter defense against bad data,” by ensuring data accuracy from the start. Bad data is less likely to propagate through the system, which reduces the risk of denials. As a result, clients using the tool have been able to reduce contingency volume by over 60%. Introducing the next generation of smart RCM technology Many organizations are investing in staffing to address claim denials, but this approach is not effective in the long run. Levitt described how preventing denials calls for technology that's built for today's challenges. “Most tools out there are built to manage the problems of the last twenty years. But twenty years ago, we didn't really have COB issues. Patients were either insured or uninsured. Now, some are over-insured and some are under-insured. You see more patients come in with one insurance card in their hand, but with two, three, or four other coverages. It's much more complex. Patient Access Curator makes it simple by bundling all the transactions into one.” The technology uses artificial intelligence, in-memory analytics, and robotic process automation to verify eligibility and COB, find and fix patient identifiers, check contact information, and generate information about the patient's propensity to pay. And the result? Providers can simplify denials management even as the insurance and operational landscape becomes more complex. Watch the webinar to hear the full discussion and find out more about how Patient Access Curator helps healthcare organizations capture accurate patient information at registration with a single click.

In a strategic move that will take claims management to the next level, Experian Health recently acquired Wave HDC, a healthcare technology company specializing in AI-guided data capture and curation. The acquisition brings together the two companies' capabilities to offer healthcare organizations faster and more accurate healthcare coverage identification. With this acquisition comes Patient Access Curator, a new solution that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to revolutionize the claims management process. Tom Cox, President at Experian Health, says, “With our vast clearinghouse data resources and Wave HDC's technology and expertise in insurance data capture processes, Experian Health now offers the best eligibility and insurance identification products in the market.” This article gives a run-down of Patient Access Curator and how it helps providers prevent claim denials in seconds. Hear our pre-recorded session from our annual Experian Health High-Performance Summit 2024 (HPS), featuring Exact Sciences and Trinity Health, as they reveal how Patient Access Curator helped their organizations automate eligibility, reduce denials, and more, all with a single click. This session offers live Q&A with Experian Health Product Leadership. Register now Prevent denials on the front end Managing claims effectively – or more specifically, preventing denials – is one of the biggest challenges for providers. In a 2022 survey by Experian Health, 72% of respondents said reducing denials was their top priority, citing reasons including payer policy changes, reimbursement delays, and a rise in the number of errors and denials. Most issues that lead to denials crop up early in the revenue cycle, when information is missed or captured incorrectly during patient registration. For this reason, it makes sense to focus denial prevention strategies on the front end. With so much data to capture, manual strategies are bound to stumble. Unfortunately, many digital tools still require staff to check multiple payer websites and data repositories to verify insurance eligibility and check for any billable coverage that might have been missed. Experian Health's industry-leading claims management products are designed to simplify these processes. The integration of Wave HDC's AI-powered data capture technology strengthens that offer with capabilities previously not available. As Cox says: “Our mission is to simplify healthcare, and this move allows us to quickly scale our portfolio with advanced logic and AI-powered technology to help solve one of the biggest administrative problems providers face today, which is claim denials.” For Jordan Levitt, co-founder of Wave HDC, the merger is a chance to bring their unique technology to more healthcare organizations. “We believe this integration will have a powerful impact for the healthcare industry, improving financial solvency and efficiencies for providers through more accurate medical billing, resulting in potentially more reimbursement, faster.” Introducing Patient Access Curator: Claims management in a single click Wave HDC's technology captures and processes patient insurance data at registration using an “if-then” logic that returns multiple data points from a single inquiry, in 30 seconds. Through Patient Access Curator, registration staff can leverage this technology to collect and verify much of the information they need to compile an accurate claim, with just a single click. In a matter of seconds, they'll have a comprehensive readout of the following: Eligibility verification: PAC automatically interrogates 271 responses, flagging up active secondary and tertiary coverage information to eliminate coverage gaps; Coordination of Benefits (COB): Integrating with eligibility verification workflow, PAC automatically analyzes payer responses to find hidden signs of additional insurances that may be missed by a human eye, and triggers additional inquiries to those third parties to determine primacy, for faster COB processing; Medicare Beneficiary Identifiers (MBI): PAC uses AI and robotic process automation to find and fix patient identifiers so no one misses out on essential support; Coverage discovery and financial status: For patient accounts marked as self-pay or unbillable, PAC automates additional coverage searches, and provides insights into the patient's propensity to pay; Demographics: Lastly, but by no means least, the platform can quickly check and correct patient contact information. Providers can hear more about shifting denials management to the front end of the revenue cycle with Patient Access Curator on a recent on-demand webinar hosted by Jordan Levitt and Jason Considine, Chief Commercial Officer at Experian Health. On the webinar, Levitt explains that Patient Access Curator achieves such speedy results “because the underlying code acts like a Rosetta Stone, automatically translating the language of the user and the health system into the terms required by the payer.” This means data can be transferred easily between interfaces. “The answer isn't multiple clicks, running one transaction at a time. With Patient Access Curator, you can know everything about the patient to run a clean revenue cycle process and propagate only clean data downstream, all within thirty seconds.” Maximize dollars, minimize workload Patient Access Curator moves away from manual methods and verifies eligibility and coverage automatically, quickly and accurately. But the platform promises more than efficiency; with this technology, Wave HDC has prevented denials of over $1 billion since 2020. At a time when revenue cycles are under increasing pressure from changing payer rules, labor dynamics and operational constraints, the new integration offers a long-awaited boost to both reimbursement rates and productivity. Patient Access Curator is available now - learn how your healthcare organization can get started and prevent claim denials in seconds. Learn more Contact us

Racing against the clock to troubleshoot billing issues, claims bottlenecks and staffing shortfalls are just part of an average day for healthcare revenue cycle managers. It's hard enough to maintain the status quo, never mind driving improvements in denial rates and net revenue. With integrated artificial intelligence (AI) and automation, many of these challenges in revenue cycle management (RCM) can be alleviated – and with just a single click. Real-time coverage discovery and coordination of benefits software reduces errors and accelerates accurate claim submissions. This eases pressure on busy RCM leaders, so they have the time to focus on improving the numbers that matter most. Top challenges in revenue cycle management Efficiency is the currency of revenue cycle management. Maximizing resources is not just about keeping dollars coming in the door but about making the best use of each team member's time and expertise. The ever-present call to “do more with less” is probably the biggest challenge. Breaking that down, some specific concerns that consume more time and resources than RCM managers would like, are: Complex billing procedures: With hundreds of health payers operating in the US, each offering different plans with different requirements, providers have their work cut out to ensure claims are coded and billed correctly. Any errors in verifying a patient's coverage, eligibility, benefits, and prior authorization requirements can lead to delays and lost revenue. More claim denials: Inaccurate patient information and billing codes guarantee a denial. Beyond the rework and revenue loss, denied claims leave patients with bills that should not be their responsibility to pay, causing confusion, frustration, and higher levels of bad debt. Garbage in, garbage out. Patient payment delays: A few years back, patients with health insurance represented about a tenth of bills marked as bad debt. Now, this group holds the majority of patient debt, according to analysts. The rise in high-deductible health plans combined with squeezed household budgets means patients are more likely to delay or default on payments. Providers must be on the lookout for ways to help patients find active coverage and plan for their bills to minimize the impact of these changes. How can AI-powered revenue cycle management solutions help? The Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH) annual index report demonstrates how much time can be saved using software-based RCM technology. Case in point: switching from manual to automated eligibility and benefits verification could save 14 minutes per transaction. This adds up quickly when daily, monthly, and yearly transactions are factored in. Predictive analytics can be used to pre-emptively identify and resolve issues and support better decision-making, giving providers a head start on those elusive efficiency gains. Three specific examples of how automation, AI and machine learning can streamline the front-end and solve challenges in revenue cycle management are as follows: 1. Upfront insurance discovery to find and fill coverage gaps Confirming active coverage across multiple payers gives patients and providers clarity about how care will be financed. But this can be a resource-heavy process when undertaken manually. Coverage Discovery uses automation to find missing and forgotten coverage with minimal resource requirements. By unearthing previously unidentified coverage earlier in the revenue cycle, claims can be submitted more quickly for faster reimbursement and fewer write-offs.With Experian Health's recent acquisition of Wave HDC, clients now have access to faster, more comprehensive insurance verification software solution. The technology works autonomously to identify existing insurance records for patients with self-pay, unbillable, or unspecified payer status and correct any gaps in the patient's coverage information. The patient's details are updated automatically so that a claim can be submitted to the correct payer. 2. Real-time eligibility verification and coordination of benefits As it gets harder to figure out each patient's specific coverage details, it also makes sense to prioritize automated eligibility verification. Eligibility Verification uses real-time eligibility and benefits data to confirm the patient's insurance status on the spot.Similarly, Wave's Coordination of Benefits solution, now available to Experian Health clients through Patient Access Curator, integrates directly into registration and scheduling workflows to boost clean claim rates. It automatically analyzes payer responses and triggers inquiries to verify active coverage and curate a comprehensive insurance profile. This means no insurance is missed, and the benefits under each plan can be coordinated seamlessly for more accurate billing. 3. Predictive denials management to prevent back-end revenue loss Adding AI and machine learning-based solutions to the claims and denials management workflow means providers can resolve more issues pre-claim to minimize the risk of back-end denials. Use cases for AI in claims management might include: Automating claims processing to alleviate staffing shortages Reviewing documentation to reduce coding errors Using predictive analytics to increase operational efficiency Improving patient and payer communications with AI-driven bots All of these contribute to a front-loaded denials management strategy. While prevention is often better than a cure, AI can be equally effective later in the process: AI AdvantageTM arms staff with the information they need to prevent denials before they occur and work them more efficiently when they do.Whatever new challenges may pop up on the RCM horizon, AI and automation are already proving their effectiveness in helping providers save time and money. But more than that, they're giving busy RCM leaders the necessary tools to start future-proofing their systems for persistent and emerging RCM challenges. Learn more or contact us to find out how healthcare organizations can use AI and automation to manage current revenue cycle management challenges with a single click.

Today, U.S. healthcare providers struggle with three significant challenges affecting care delivery—each resulting from chronic healthcare workforce shortages. Ultimately, these challenges threaten the fiscal health of the country's most critical care safety nets. Over 80% of the healthcare C-suite say the chronic staffing shortage creates significant risk for their organizations. The effects of healthcare staffing shortages are severe - Experian Health's recent survey of revenue cycle leaders found these executives unanimously agreed that staffing shortages impact cash flow, patient engagement, and the work environment of their current staff. Experian Health’s new survey, Short Staffed for the Long-Term, polled 200 revenue cycle employees to determine the effects of healthcare staffing shortages on patients, the workforce, and their facilities. What did these teams say about the healthcare workforce shortage and the state of care delivery? Find out by downloading the full report. Healthcare providers experience a vicious cycle, and the effects of healthcare staffing shortages can be seen in many different areas. For example, it makes it harder for existing team members to register patients on the front end of the encounter. On the back end, revenue cycle staff face higher workloads and stress leading to preventable reimbursement claims errors and missed collections opportunities. Ultimately, that stress leads to staff turnover, exacerbating the healthcare workforce shortage. This article dives into three effects of healthcare staffing shortages and how providers can combat them. Result 1: Short-staffed providers struggle with reimbursement and cash flow. 70% of respondents who say staff shortages affect payer reimbursement also report escalating denial rates. 83% report it's harder to follow up on late payments or help patients struggling to pay their bills. Costs are up, and cash flow is down. Claims denials are increasing by 15% annually. Reimbursement rates continue to decline even as denials rise and patient debt increases. These are the revenue cycle challenges healthcare providers face on top of the chronic healthcare staffing shortage. Healthcare organizations must look for new ways to improve reimbursements while engaging patients and staff to benefit everyone involved. Experian Health's Short Staffed for the Long-Term report noted two of the most significant revenue channels for healthcare providers, claims reimbursement and collections, are experiencing significant challenges. Reimbursement denials tie up cash flow in an endless cat-and-mouse game of revenue collection. HealthLeaders termed 2023 as, “the year of reducing denials for revenue cycle.” Their statistics further reinforce Experian Health data correlating increasing denial rates with the healthcare staffing shortage. Simultaneously, healthcare providers find it harder to collect from patients. High self-pay costs lead to lower patient collection rates. One study showed patient collections declining from 76% in 2020 to 55% in 2021. Providers desperately need a more patient-centered collections process that helps these customers understand their cost obligations and payment options. Integrating automated collections solutions can also help providers do more with less. Healthcare stakeholders must collaborate to devise innovative solutions that prioritize workforce augmentation and streamline financial workflows. Technology can solve these problems by automating manual revenue cycle processes that lead to delayed reimbursements. New solutions that use artificial intelligence (AI) software can help in other areas (like claims denials) to save staff time and reduce workloads. Result 2: A lack of staff directly impacts successful patient engagement. Surveyed staff say 55% of patients experience engagement issues at scheduling and intake. 40% say patient estimates suffer, leading to potential miscommunications in credit and collections. Experian Health's The State of Patient Access, 2023: The Digital Front Door reported patients and providers believe healthcare access is worsening. 87% of providers in the survey blamed the effects of healthcare staffing shortages. Earlier data from ECRI shows patients wait longer for care, and nearly 50% of providers say access is worse. Over 100 academic studies in the past two decades confirm the correlation between poor patient health outcomes and industry staff shortages. Existing staff members may take on heavier workloads to cover gaps in patient care. The resulting fatigue can impact the quality of care delivery. When healthcare organizations are short-staffed, each team member may spend less time with patients, resulting in rushed assessments and potentially missed diagnoses. Staff shortages can impact every phase of the patient journey, beginning with patient scheduling and potentially delayed essential medical services. On the backend, patients suffer when the pressure staff members feel to work faster causes preventable errors leading to healthcare claim denials. Collections suffer, as frustrations mount, and healthcare staff waste time on patients who are simply unable to pay. The adverse effects of staffing shortages in healthcare weaken with technology to improve the patient experience at every stage of their encounter. Better technology lessens the burden of care for staff by automating mundane administrative tasks so every provider can focus on serving patients—not filling out forms. Improving patient engagement starts at the beginning of the healthcare encounter. For example, patient scheduling software can create a seamless online experience that halves appointment booking time. More than 70% of patients say they prefer the control these self-scheduling portals offer, putting access to care back in their hands. Patient payment estimation software creates much-needed healthcare price transparency, improving satisfaction by eliminating financial surprises after treatment. These solutions, combined with automated revenue cycle management software, can streamline healthcare processes and improve patient experiences. Result 3: Overwork is the norm as staff work environments decline and turnover increases. 37% of survey respondents report issues with staff burnout. 29% list the departure of experienced staff as one of their top challenges. Whether in frontend care delivery or backend revenue cycle, overworked and stressed healthcare professionals are more susceptible to making mistakes, diminishing the overall quality of the patient experience. The attention to detail, a critical component in a complex, high-stakes business, may be compromised due to the strain on the existing staff. When a healthcare organization is short-staffed, it increases the stress on the existing employees. In turn, this contributes to higher turnover rates. Job dissatisfaction and increased stress levels create a challenging work environment, perpetuating the cycle of staffing shortages. Recruiting and training new staff to fill these gaps further exacerbate the strain on existing teams. One area that is critically impacted by staffing shortages is seen in claims management, as claim denials continue to increase, which cost American healthcare providers an estimated 2.5% of their gross revenues annually. Billions of reimbursement dollars logjam in the endless cycle of claims submissions, rejections, and manual mitigations. In 2022, the cost of denials management increased by 67%. Revenue cycle staff, stretched to their limits by staffing shortages, will likely continue to make preventable mistakes during patient intake and claims submission. However, automating claims management with a solution like ClaimSource® can help lower denial rates and ease this burden.  This solution delivers increased operational efficiencies and effectiveness by prioritizing claims, payments and denials so that users can work the highest impact accounts first. Other solutions, like Claim Scrubber, can improve claim accuracy before submission, by submitting clean and accurate claims every time. These technologies enable healthcare providers to reduce claims denials while relieving some of the terrible pressure felt by their financial teams to work harder and faster. By automating clean claims submissions, healthcare organizations free up their teams to focus on taking better care of patients—and themselves. Healthcare staffing shortages + manual revenue cycle = Unsustainability What happens to a process that heavily relies on human labor—when there aren’t enough people to go around? In the case of the healthcare revenue cycle, it means staffing shortages heavily impact a hospital's ability to collect revenue. Medical Economics reports that 78% of providers still conduct patient collections with traditional paper statements or other manual processes. In an era of talent shortages, these manual processes bog down the entire organization with no relief in sight. Overwork leads to burnout, a significant problem in the industry that also contributes to staff turnover. But this is exactly how digital technology can solve the healthcare staffing shortage. While AI and automation can’t help providers find the staff they need, it can eliminate manual tasks and reduce errors that lead to more work, staff burnout, and patient care disruption. McKinsey says automation can eliminate approximately half of the activities employees now perform. It could considerably improve the work environments for revenue cycle staff, allowing them to focus on high-value tasks, and engage patients in more caring and personalized experiences. Experian Health offers providers proven technologies to increase revenue, improve patient care, and lessen the strain on existing staff, to combat the effects of healthcare staffing shortages. Contact Experian Health today to get started.

Getting a claim right the first time is much less expensive than reworking it. Experian Health's 2022 State of Claims survey illustrates most claims denials result from simple human errors. Automation and claim scrubbing software help lower the burden of denied claims. But payer contract management software offers one of the most critical strategies for optimizing revenue cycle. These tools help providers maximize reimbursements throughout the lifecycle of their payer contracts.   Experian Health client OrthoTennessee, which has an 86% successful appeals rate, recovers hundreds of thousands of dollars annually by conducting contract audits and recovering underpayments with these tools. This result could extrapolate across healthcare if providers consider implementing payer contract management software.  Understanding the financial impact of denial rates Denial rates can significantly affect a healthcare provider's revenue. One study showed these administrative complexities cause $265 billion in healthcare misspending annually. Preventing claims denials should be a high-priority issue for healthcare providers. It's an untenable situation for cash-strapped healthcare providers, and by most accounts, the problem is getting worse.  Payer contract management software reduces denial rates. A well-managed contract ensures providers are reimbursed accurately and promptly, reducing denials due to billing errors or non-compliance. Individual payer contracts stipulate how and how much a healthcare provider gets paid. In addition to critical payment terms, payer contracts contain:  How many days a provider has to submit a claim  How many days the payer will take to reimburse a correctly submitted claim  The services and scope of coverage by payer  Reimbursement rates for every covered service  How to dispute a claim denial  The term of the payer contract  When to renegotiate or the notice period for a contract termination Most of these reimbursement contracts allow payer amendments. Tricia Ibrahim, Director of Product Management, Contract Manager Suite, says, “Depending on how the contract is written, providers may receive very little notice of these changes. Without a way to systematically and efficiently monitor these agreements throughout the contract term, there is simply no way for a provider to ensure they're paid properly.” Better payer contract management can reduce denials and improve revenue collection by reducing the most common reasons for medical claim denials.  Proactive strategies for denial reduction Proactive denial reduction correlates with a better bottom line. This effort entails a multi-faceted approach with two key elements at its core: Analyzing payer contracts for pitfalls To mitigate denials effectively, healthcare providers must scrutinize payer contracts meticulously. By delving into the fine print, organizations can identify potential pitfalls and the sources of denials. Whether complex reimbursement terms, ambiguous language, or stringent coding requirements, a comprehensive contract analysis can unveil these challenges. Crafting contract strategies for denial mitigation With a deep understanding of contract nuances, providers can develop tailored strategies for denial mitigation. These strategies encompass streamlined claims submission and staff training. Additionally, organizations can engage in informed negotiations with payers to amend unfavorable reimbursement terms.  Through this fusion of contract analysis and proactive strategy development, providers can navigate the complex landscape of healthcare payer contracting with precision, ultimately reducing denials and bolstering financial stability.  Crafting comprehensive contract management strategies for denial mitigation Developing proactive strategies within payer contract management is a critical component of denial reduction.   For example, when creating payer contracts in healthcare, providers must proactively negotiate advantageous terms for their organization. These negotiations should focus on fair reimbursement rates, reasonable timeframes for claims submission, and other favorable conditions that minimize the potential for denials.  Strategies should also encompass addressing ambiguities in healthcare payer contracting. These misunderstandings lead to disputes and denials. Clarifying any vague or unclear language within the agreement ensures all parties have a shared understanding of the terms and expectations.  Finally, to mitigate denials effectively, healthcare payer contracts should align seamlessly with billing and coding practices. These contracts must reflect current industry standards and guidelines to prevent discrepancies resulting in claim rejections. Harnessing the power of payer contract management software in healthcare  Payer contract management software offers healthcare providers a powerful way to automate payer document analysis. A single provider can have 20 or more payer contracts to manage. From HMOs to PPOs, fee-for-service federal programs, third-party administrators, to ACOs and CINs—the payer list can be long. While a thorough analysis of healthcare payer contracting is essential to identify potential areas of improvement, it can be challenging to scrutinize all of these contract terms and conditions to mitigate future denial risks. But with the right software, this revenue cycle function can be a game-changer.  Payer contract management software can handle contract renewal and regulatory updates automatically, ensuring healthcare providers remain compliant. The software eliminates the hours spent manually reviewing data. Some of the benefits include:  Centralizing contracts in one location  Alerting significant milestones, such as contract renewals or changes  Automating processes and workflows  Linking contracts with provider procedures and complianc OrthoTennessee Manager of Payer Strategy, Frances Thomas, uses Experian Health's payer contract management software. She states, “The system gives us the information we need to be successful. They can't really argue with you on that.”  The role of automation in error reduction  Healthcare runs on revenue. Automation is pivotal for reducing healthcare claims errors that tie up revenue in the denials process. Automation software streamlines workflows, reducing manual intervention and the likelihood of human errors. These tools can apply across the revenue cycle, including during the payer contract management process. For example, Experian Health's payer contract management software includes Contract Manager and Contract Analysis features that can automatically:  Compare the expected payment with the actual reimbursement from payors  Maintain and manage contract terms  Pinpoint underpayments  Audit claims   Analyze claims data and the financial impact of potential changes to provider fee schedules  Highlight bulk claims for appeal en masse   OrthoTennessee highlights the importance of the ability to handle claims in bulk. Thomas says, “We had over 600 claims for one day in the wrong network. I was able to take that bulk of claims and handle those—otherwise, I was going to have to sit there and go claim by claim. It's a huge time saver to work smarter, not harder.”  Real-time verification and validation with automation Automated systems revolutionize healthcare operations by offering real-time verification and validation capabilities. Automation technology streamlines the billing process and minimizes errors that can lead to claim denials. It enhances efficiency and precision, allowing healthcare staff to allocate more time to patient care. As providers embrace automation, they can expect increased accuracy and financial stability. RevCycleIntelligence estimates the healthcare industry could save nearly 41%, or nearly $25 billion, of the $60 billion they spend annually by fully automating administrative transactions. But payers also stand to benefit; McKinsey says administrative automation could shave 30% off insurance claims processing costs.  Seamless integration of automation with payer contracts  Integrating automation tools with payer contracts in healthcare enhances efficiency. Integration ensures contract terms are consistently applied throughout the claims lifecycle, reducing denials. Interoperability between these platforms also improves the payer-provider relationship by increasing communication and streamlining processes.   Cross-platform integration creates two-way accountability that's a win/win for both provider and payer. It's a transformative step in healthcare revenue cycle management that could:  Streamline claims submission, verification, and adjudication  Continuously monitor claims for contract adherence and correct problems before they lead to denials  Reduce human errors  Apply advanced analytics to identify trends and patterns   Improve contract negotiations with data-driven decision-making  Lower administrative costs  Navigating challenges and embracing payer contract management software Healthcare providers face numerous challenges in revenue cycle management, especially when handling intricate payer contracts and the need for standardized handling of these documents. These challenges create scenarios where providers underbill or are underpaid for services, in addition to tying up revenue in denials management. Becker's Hospital Review reports providers lose up to 3% of their revenue from underpayments. Plus, the insurance industry isn't immune to making mistakes; the AMA says the claims processing error rate of public and private payers is more than 19%. By harnessing the power of technology, healthcare providers can streamline complex payer contracts and standardize how providers handle these agreements. For example:  To expedite negotiations, modeling tools within payer contract management software offer claim scenarios that help providers negotiate better rates from payers.  These systems provide real-time feedback through smart log messages, enhancing staff training and refining registration best practices.   Most healthcare organizations lack the time and resources to closely monitor payer contracts. When these agreements are on auto-renewal, it's easy to forget their importance. Payer contract management software helps these organizations wring the maximum amount out of these revenue streams. Embracing Experian Health's payer Contract Management software Experian Health's healthcare payer contract management software offers a comprehensive contract management solution that can substantially lower denial rates. By adopting this software, providers can maximize revenue potential and streamline their revenue cycle. Importantly, healthcare providers can implement payer contract management tools without adding staff or conducting major process improvements. This software is the one tool organizations need to ensure they don't leave revenue on the table. Learn more or contact us to speak to our experts.