Tag: claims
As economists offer up their best guesses for the US economy over the coming year, healthcare leaders know one thing for sure: no matter what happens, they need solid revenue cycle management (RCM) processes to remain financially sound and deliver high-quality care. Revenue cycle management connects the financial and clinical aspects of care by ensuring that providers are properly reimbursed for their services, through accurate and efficient billing and claims management processes. Keeping the financial scales tipped in the right direction is a growing challenge: data from the American Hospital Association shows that payer delays and denials are driving up operational costs while slowing revenue. Many providers are turning to artificial intelligence (AI), automation and data analytics to eliminate inefficiencies and maximize reimbursement. Factors that affect healthcare revenue cycle management While revenue cycle math is pretty simple – money in versus money out – the reality is more complex. A tight grip on delivery costs is just one part of the equation. Most RCM efforts center around determining who owes what and collating the necessary documentation to secure prompt payment from each party. A few factors to consider include: Are there reliable processes for capturing accurate patient information? How quickly can coverage and pre-authorizations be verified? Are claims and denials managed efficiently? How easy is it for patients to understand and pay their bills? Can RCM leaders monitor and analyze staff and agency performance? Changing payer policies, patients' financial status and data management demands add to the challenge. The goal of revenue cycle management To achieve the primary aim of getting reimbursed in full and on time, organizations must reduce billing errors, submit clean claims and refine operational efficiency so staff can stay laser-focused on high-value tasks. But it's important to look beyond the spreadsheets: selecting the right tools to deliver a transparent and compassionate patient experience will boost the bottom line, too. History and evolution of RCM RCM has shifted from largely paper-based processes to sophisticated software-based systems in just a few decades. Few could have imagined how those early healthcare information systems of the 1970s would evolve as electronic health records, standardized coding frameworks and digital data processing came to the fore. Changes in regulation and reimbursement models furthered the need for advanced analytics. And now, the rise of healthcare consumerism drives demand for the industry to open its digital front door. Organizations that commit to digital transformation will be in a stronger position to navigate today's RCM challenges and meet the needs of digitally native consumers. Relationship between patient experience and RCM Experian Health's recently published State of Patient Access Survey 2024 reveals the extent to which the patient experience affects revenue. Integrating patient-centered principles into RCM processes improves patient satisfaction, makes it easier for patients to understand and pay their bills, and leads to better financial performance overall. Steps in the healthcare revenue cycle A typical revenue cycle management workflow in healthcare follows the patient’s journey. Each touchpoint in the patient's journey is an opportunity to check that patients, payers and back-off teams have the information they need to expedite payment: Scheduling – When the patient books an appointment, administrative staff verify the patient's insurance eligibility. This is a chance to make sure pricing is transparent and give the patient an estimate for the cost of care. Registration – Next, the provider captures the patients' medical history, insurance coverage and other demographics. Correct patient information on the front end reduces the errors that cause rework in the back office. Prior authorization – Front-end staff check whether the patient's insurance provider requires prior authorization for the procedure or service they need. Skipping this step can lead to costly denials and rework. Treatment and follow-up – After treatment, the back office collates billable charges and assigns a medical billing code to the claim. Accuracy is paramount, as reworking claim rejections can drain resources. Claim submission – Then, the claim must be submitted to the payer. Accurate and timely submissions prevent rejections and reimbursement delays. If a claim is denied, it must be resubmitted as quickly as possible to avoid lost revenue. Collections – Once the payer approves the claim, the patient's out-of-pocket costs are calculated and billed. Providing a range of convenient payment methods will increase the likelihood of prompt payment. Regulatory and compliance considerations At each stage in the process, staff must stay mindful of the regulatory and compliance frameworks governing revenue cycle management. These are primarily patient-centered. For example, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) safeguards patient privacy and sensitive health information, while the No Surprises Act seeks to make pricing more transparent. Failure to adhere brings severe reputational and financial risks, as made painfully clear by recent headlines about the cost of cyberattacks within the industry. Common challenges in healthcare RCM For most providers, avoiding the cycle of claim denials and rework is the biggest challenge. A survey of 1300 hospitals found that denials by commercial payers had increased by 20.2%, while Medicare Advantage denials had increased by 55.7% between January 2022 and July 2023. Reliance on inefficient manual processes to track and monitor claims does little to help. A 2023 CAQH report shows that switching from manual to electronic claim status inquiries could reduce the time spent on each transaction by 17 minutes, saving the medical industry more than $3.2 billion overall. Providers are also collecting increasing sums from self-pay patients. Financial pressures and uncertainty around coverage mean many patients cannot fully cover their medical expenses. Improving their financial journey with accurate upfront estimates, clear and compassionate communications, and convenient payment methods will accelerate payments. Unfortunately, there's still some way to go: the State of Patient Access Survey 2024 found that 64% of patients had not received a cost estimate before care, and of those that did, 14% reported final costs that were much higher than expected. Financial impact analysis To track the financial effects of these challenges, healthcare organizations should identify key performance indicators (KPIs) aligned to their specific priorities. Conducting real-time monitoring and analysis of patient access, collections, claims and contract management metrics can flag up opportunities to prevent revenue leakage and maximize income. Read more about how to identify the right KPIs for your revenue cycle dashboard. 4 ways to improve revenue cycle management in healthcare When it comes to implementing specific revenue cycle management solutions, the following four tactics are likely to yield the greatest return on investment: Automate AccessA healthy revenue cycle begins with quick, accurate and efficient patient access systems. Automated, data-driven workflows reduce the errors that lead to denials and rework. Online scheduling allows patients to easily book appointments, while solutions like Patient Access Curator use AI to capture all patient data at registration with a single click. Increase collectionsMaximizing patient collections while fostering a positive patient experience can be a delicate balance. Patient access staff must be the patient's advocate, while ensuring the organization collects what’s owed. Giving patients upfront estimates of their financial responsibility and offering appropriate financial plans makes it as easy as possible for them to pay. Collections Optimization Manager allows providers to focus their efforts on the right accounts, through highly predictive patient segmentation. Streamline claimsAutomating claims management is another way to use technology to accelerate reimbursement. Claims management software verifies that each claim is coded properly before being submitted. Encounters can be processed in real-time with automatic alerts to flag any issues before the claim is submitted. Experian Health's flagship AI Advantage™ solution helps predict and prevent denials by checking claims before they are submitted and calculating the probability of denial. It evaluates and segments denials that occur based on the likelihood of reimbursement following resubmission, and prioritizes the work queue so staff make the best use of time. Increase reimbursementHealthcare organizations that don't stay current on payer policy and procedure changes risk payment delays and lost revenue. Providers and payers must be on the same page to quickly resolve mismatches between expected and actual reimbursement amounts. Automated payer policy and procedure change notifications help providers strengthen relationships with payers and avoid payment delays. How healthy is your revenue cycle? Our revenue cycle management checklist helps healthcare organizations catch inefficiencies and find opportunities to boost cash flow. Case studies See how automated revenue cycle solutions helped Stanford Health optimize their patient collections strategy. See how Schneck Medical Center prevents claim denials with AI AdvantageTM Hear how UC San Diego Health used automation to improve patient billing and drive collections. Getting the most out of revenue cycle management software These case studies demonstrate that a successful revenue management strategy has three essential ingredients: data, software and training. Experian Health's “Best in KLAS” revenue cycle management solutions are built on proven technology and proprietary databases, to help staff find new opportunities to bring in revenue. Experienced consultants are on hand to guide staff and ensure workflows are set up for the best results. The future of RCM Whatever the economic outlook, technology’s defining role in the future of revenue cycle management is undisputed. Payers are already leveraging AI to their advantage, and patients have come to expect convenient digital transactions—any providers that fail to embrace AI and automation-based RCM solutions will fall behind the competition. Learn more about how Experian Health's revenue cycle management solutions generate more revenue for healthcare organizations.
The repercussions of errors on the healthcare claims processing workflow can be major and wide-ranging. It slows the revenue cycle, interrupts cash flow, consumes staff hours, creates frustration for staff and patients, and, in the worst cases, sacrifices revenue. Errors are a perennial—maybe even inevitable—problem but understanding some common reasons behind these mistakes can help. Additionally, digital claims management tools can help you automate claims processing to reduce claims errors, submit cleaner claims, and get paid successfully. In June 2022, Experian Health surveyed 200 revenue cycle decision-makers to understand the current state of claims management. Watch the video to see the results: Any number of claim errors can lead to denials: incorrect medical coding, missing prior authorizations, clearinghouse issues and more. Here are 7 of the most common reasons for claim errors: 1. Claim errors can be caused by missing and inaccurate data “The number one denial issue most providers encounter is eligibility,” says Rob Stucker, Senior Vice President at Experian Health. “These issues begin upstream from the claims process during registration or pre-registration when the patient information that’s collected is either inaccurate or incomplete. It may be as simple as a patient giving their name as Rob instead of Robert, or the registration staff selecting Medicaid as the payer, instead of Medicaid Managed Care. If the eligibility information is even slightly off, the claim will come back as denied.” Collecting accurate demographic and insurance information up-front using digital patient intake tools opens the digital front door and can help eliminate errors during the healthcare claims management process. 2. Manual processes and disparate systems Wherever claims processes are not automated, human error and delays can set in. In addition to typical random glitches and mistakes, many healthcare providers struggle with disparate systems from multiple vendors, in which the front-end and back-end do not communicate seamlessly. Using a single vendor with solutions that manage the entire claims processing cycle can provide holistic help. ClaimSource manages eligibility validation by repurposing Experian eligibility transactions that providers have already run at registration and editing them against the claim. This process allows providers to double-check the eligibility of the claim before it gets submitted, at no additional cost. In addition, it also does extensive claim editing, submissions, reconciliations, and reporting. This solution creates prioritized workflows and provides access to a national library of documented government and commercial payer edits, as well as custom edits, to meet individual provider needs. 3. Changes in payer requirements can cause claims errors “Providers tell us that a major pain point is constantly changing payer rules,” says Stucker. “Providers are confident that their claims are good, but the payers’ adjudication rules may have changed without prior notice.” The problem here is exponential: voluminous changes multiplied by a range of communication channels (or faulty communication) multiplied again by a proliferation of payers and policies. Keeping pace with these changes is difficult without partner support. “We continuously monitor hundreds of thousands of payer website pages each night for updates,” says Stucker. “When a change is flagged, an analyst looks at it and decides whether it should be added as an edit. We update our huge global library of edits on a weekly or even daily basis. These edits enable ClaimSource and our pre-837 editor, Claim Scrubber to automatically review claims for errors using the most recent payer updates. 4. Prior authorizations Pre-authorizations present challenges at many levels. 8 in 10 providers saw prior authorization requirements increase during 2021. Providers must track changing requirements, obtain authorizations prior to treatment or claims submission, and complete claims that meet complex requirements. When prior authorization requirements aren’t met, appealing a denial can be complicated at best, and many times prove to be irreversible. According to Medical Group Management Association data, a simple denial takes a seasoned biller two to eight minutes to work, but a complicated denial involving prior authorization requirements can take up to an hour to work, largely thanks to time spent on hold. Ensuring claims are completed as required in the first place using a pre-authorization tool, in combination with a claims editor that validates against pre-authorizations, saves valuable time and stress. 5. Short staffing and new trainees Staff hours and expertise are both in short supply, as many providers struggle to retain experienced staff and bring new hires up to speed. Having an automated process with built-in review and analytics can help ensure that claims are completed accurately and quickly. A Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare study found automated claims take 25% less time to process than manual claims, boosting productivity and freeing staff up for the more human-intensive aspects of their work. However, the key is “accurate and user-friendly” automation. A claims vendor should be keeping edits up to date, submitting claims timely and accurately to the correct payer, keep organizations informed on the claim’s status throughout the adjudication process, retrieve electronic remit files, link them to the correct claims, and establish a denial workflow to automatically show denials. This should all be done in an extremely easy to use user interface or directly back into Patient Accounting/Practice Management Systems. If vendors aren’t doing this, then staff will just be working harder instead of smarter. 6. Slow response and follow-through can lead to claim errors Although delays themselves don’t necessarily cause errors, they can make resolution difficult and time-consuming. Time is always an issue for providers as claims must be submitted in specific time frames from the date of service. Therefore, getting the claim created, processed through a claims vendor and submitted to the correct payer must be done efficiently, or timely filing deadlines are missed. The same is true for identifying and re-working denials. Denial backlogs quickly become overwhelming, increasing the odds of items slipping through the cracks or re-submission/appeal deadlines being missed. Automating status updates with enhanced claim status monitoring can relieve time-strapped staff of having to contact payers manually for the latest information on claims to find out which ones are being paid or denied. Enhanced Claim Status submits automatic status requests based on each payer’s adjudication timeline from the date of claim submission, returning the payer’s proprietary responses weeks before the Electronic Remittance Advice or Explanation of Benefits are processed. This gives staff a huge head start on working denials. 7. Difficulty managing denials When errors cause claims to be denied, a response is critical. A denials workflow management solution can optimize follow-up by identifying claim denials, holds, suspensions, zero-pays, and prioritizing denials that need the fastest attention. Denial Workflow Manager also allows organizations to track root causes, which in turn can identify operational changes that can be made upstream, and reduce the denials from happening to being with. Automation is the future of effective claims management Claims management is becoming more complex and demanding, but the digital tools that automate and improve processes can help providers rise to the occasion. It’s now possible to capture and use accurate data, integrate systems and processes to work together, stay up to date on payer requirements, track claim status, and even manage denials efficiently with the help of technology. Learn more about other solutions that can help healthcare organizations with claims management.
The payer policy rollercoaster has taken a few twists and turns recently, leaving healthcare organizations out of the loop if they try to keep pace with payer requirements using manual systems alone. Keeping track of changing payer requirements has long been a major challenge for providers, but several shifts in the reimbursement landscape have prompted payers to implement updates at rates providers may struggle to match. More flexible policies permitted during the pandemic are being rolled back, altered employment patterns are influencing insurance plan administration, and new clinical delivery models (such as telehealth) are necessitating different coding structures. Healthcare providers that fail to keep up with these changes could end up wasting many hours and resources to rework claims. Instead, they should consider using automated payer alerts to ease the administrative burden, keep a lid on denial rates and protect profits. Automated payer alerts give providers the power of knowledge For many providers, staying on top of payer requirements involves recurring calendar reminders to check payer websites, subscribing to payer newsletters or social media accounts, or poring over industry media coverage for a hint at possible changes to come. If these checks were automated, providers could save hours of valuable staff time, and feel confident that no vital details are missed. With automated Payer Alerts, providers get instant access to the payer policy and procedure changes they’re too busy to catch. It’s a simple and convenient way to monitor modifications so claims can be submitted correctly the first time. This means staff can spend less time researching changes to procedures. Through an online portal and daily email digest, providers get timely alerts about payer changes posted on more than 120,000 different web pages. Every notification is the result of extensive behind-the-scenes work by Experian Health’s proprietary software. The program generates alerts with a detailed summary of changes, a link to the affected policy and a breakdown of changes by healthcare specialty. This allows providers to prioritize those that are most relevant to their organization. Client success story: Payer Alerts pay big dividends Being in the loop about what’s covered and what’s not puts providers in a better position to protect revenue by enabling more efficient allocation of resources, minimizing claim denials and avoiding missed revenue opportunities. New York-based University Physicians Network (UPN) implemented Payer Alerts to help physicians avoid denied claims. The CEO said, “Payers are increasing their edits, but if you know about them ahead of time and can make the required adjustments, you can avoid both denials and time-consuming appeals. With Experian Health, we now have an automated, straightforward process that helps us minimize unnecessary denials and take a proactive approach.” One UPN group recovered $42,000 as a result of a Payer Alert on a single policy change. Amplify results with the right healthcare payer solutions Payer Alerts helps healthcare organizations streamline their workflow and maximize revenue through more than just its immediate features. Its compatibility with other automated healthcare payer solutions can build the perfect defense against payer reimbursement challenges. For example, combining Payer Alerts with Contract Manager and Contract Analysis helps hospitals manage multiple payer contracts and checks that the correct amount has been reimbursed. Contract Manager allows providers to monitor payer performance and arms them with the data to negotiate more favorable contracts. It generates reports that support better communication with payers. This results in fewer phone calls to resolve issues and reduces the likelihood of misunderstandings over patient insurance status or whether a claim was received. Similarly, Claim Scrubber works alongside Payer Alerts to review every claim and verify that it’s coded correctly before being sent to the payer, to reduce the risk of denials. Claim Scrubber also now includes billing modifiers designed to support compliance with the Appropriate Use Criteria program. Using Payer Alerts to keep pace with regulatory changes Looking ahead, providers must continue to pay attention to legislative changes that affect payer strategies. Implementation of the No Surprises Act and related legislation should lead to greater transparency and more effective data sharing within the healthcare community. However, it also puts pressure on payer-provider relationships. Payer rules may continue to change, which means that payers may interpret these rules differently. Experian Health’s regulatory solutions can help providers stay on top of these changes and avoid penalties. Ultimately, providers can’t respond to changing payer policies if they don’t know those changes have been made. While change is inevitable, losing valuable time and revenue to inefficient manual processes is not. By investing in automated healthcare payer solutions, providers can adapt to change and stay ahead of the game. Find out more about how Experian Health’s Payer Alerts can help healthcare organizations capture the necessary information to make timely and strategic decisions to protect profits.
The Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) program is due to come into full effect in January 2023 at the earliest. The program was established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to help providers order the most appropriate diagnostic imaging services. Failure to comply may result in claims denials. Any provider that offers these services to Medicare beneficiaries should amend their clinical and revenue cycle workflows now, to avoid payment penalties when the AUC testing period comes to an end. This article sets out what providers can do to learn, test and prepare for the AUC program, and what Experian Health is doing to help healthcare providers manage these changes and minimize the risk of denied claims. What is the Appropriate Use Criteria program? The AUC program was created through the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 to help ensure that diagnostic imaging services would only be provided where medically necessary. No one would argue against evidence-based care. However, accessing that evidence can be challenging. Easy-access online tools are intended to make this easier. They have also been shown to reduce the overutilization of high-risk, high-cost imaging services. Under the program, any time a physician (or a member of their clinical staff) wants to order imaging services such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) for certain Medicare patients, they’ll need to consult an electronic Clinical Decision Support Mechanism (CDSM). This is especially important in an academic teaching environment. This online portal will check the patient’s electronic health record (EHR) and determine whether the order adheres to AUC or not, or whether the AUC consulted was not applicable. After consulting the CDSM, the ordering physician will need to include the following data on the order they send to the imaging services provider: the CDSM they consulted the ordering provider’s National Provider Identifier whether the service adhered to the applicable AUC or not, or whether no criteria in the CDSM were applicable to the patient’s clinical situation. Any ordering professionals deemed to be outliers will be required to seek prior authorization. When the program is fully implemented, imaging service providers will need to ensure they have a certificate of compliance to secure reimbursement. Who will be affected by the AUC program? The program applies to any provider that orders advanced diagnostic imaging services that are delivered in physician’s offices, hospital outpatient departments, ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) or independent diagnostic testing facilities. It applies to those that are paid under the Medicare physician fee schedule, hospital outpatient prospective payment system or ASC payment system. It does not apply to Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. Emergencies, inpatient services and certain hardship exceptions are exempt. If any of these exceptions apply, the ordering physician must record them on the claim using the appropriate modifier code. When do providers need to implement it? CMS confirmed that there will be no payment consequences for failing to include AUC data until the later of January 2023 or the declared end of the COVID-19 public health emergency. In the meantime, providers are encouraged to implement the program on a voluntary basis, which will help identify pinch points in the claims management workflow. Claims submitted before full implementation may still be subject to denial, so it’s worth getting the process right now to avoid unnecessary rework later. How can providers “learn, test and prepare” for the AUC program? Healthcare organizations that may be affected by the AUC mandate should consider the following actions to ensure they are fully prepared by the time the program is fully implemented: Check the AUC program requirements and identify which service lines and vendors will be affected. Choose an appropriate Medicare-approved CDSM that closely matches existing EHR and claims management processes. Most EHR vendors will recommend a CDSM that fits seamlessly with their solution. CMS has also provided a list of certified CDSMs, which includes free options. However, these operate as stand-alone systems that will be more challenging to integrate with existing workflows. Communicate changes to staff. Ensure all referring and rendering providers are aware of and trained on the requirements and encourage dialogue to clarify new ways of working. Consider the impact on claims management teams, and ensure staff are trained on the new requirements. Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System G-codes and modifiers must be reported in claims alongside primary and secondary diagnosis and procedure codes. Are staff aware of the new codes? Are additional staff needed to process claims and potential rework that may be required after the AUC program is implemented? Build in time for review, to check that new processes are compliant. Ideally, the CDSM solution will include reporting functions to monitor progress and identify potential outliers that may be subject to prior authorizations later. If the furnishing provider is different from the ordering provider, the furnishing provider should have a workflow to confirm AUC adherence. How can digital tools and automation help providers ensure compliance with Appropriate Use Criteria? While the goal of the AUC program is to improve patient care and help manage the cost to the public purse, there will be an administrative burden for staff. The growing volume and complexity of claims overrule any attempt to manage this manually. Instead, healthcare organizations should look at automating the compliance process to ensure accuracy, prevent denied claims and reduce staff costs. To help healthcare providers manage these changes, Experian Health enhanced the Medical Necessity application to generate informational alerts when a procedure needs to adhere to AUC or prior authorization for Medicare patients. Users will be able to use this alert as a sign to check the AUC has been adhered to. These tools also fit well with Claim Scrubber, which reviews every line of each claim to verify that it’s coded correctly and isn’t missing any vital information, before being submitted. Claim Scrubber has also been enhanced to incorporate billing modifiers that will help with overall compliance requirements under the AUC rules. Preparing for what’s to come Access to medically necessary services is at the heart of evidence-based care. However, in promoting this, the Appropriate Use Criteria program creates additional tasks for staff that need to be understood and managed efficiently. While there are currently no penalties for non-compliance, providers should use the testing period to proactively implement new processes to determine their efficacy. As healthcare regulation continues to evolve, healthcare organizations should take a holistic approach to the exchange of information between clinical decision-makers, service providers and payers to lay the groundwork for consistent, accurate and reliable claims. Find out more about how Experian Health’s Medical Necessity and Claim Scrubber solutions support the claims management process and help healthcare organizations adhere to the Appropriate Use Criteria program.
Claims denials are a major source of headaches for healthcare organizations. On average, denied claims can take more than two weeks longer to pay out than first-time claims, if they get paid at all. Denials can have major downstream impacts, including lower annual net revenue, additional hours spent on administrative work, and potential disruptions to patient care. Claims denials aren’t just an occasional inconvenience, either. A recent American Hospital Association (AHA) survey found that 89% of all hospitals and health systems have seen a rise in denials over the past three years, with half of the participants describing the increase as “significant.” Data from Healthcare.gov confirms this trend. The Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) states that in 2019, health plans available on the individual market denied an average of 17% of all claims – up from 14% the year before. It’s becoming more critical than ever for healthcare organizations to employ integrated, intuitive, and technology-driven strategies to get their claims paid in a timely and efficient manner. Reduce claim denials by eliminating administrative errors and manual processes Health plans can deny claims for any number of reasons. The good news is that in 2019, KFF found that less than 1% of claims were denied based on medical necessity. The bad news is that the remaining 99% were denied largely due to other reasons. This included referrals, prior authorizations, coverage disputes, data errors, and clearinghouse problems. Many claims denial issues occur when organizations rely on manual processing of complex documents that are subject to ever-changing requirements from a wide variety of payers. Mistakes are not uncommon, and that ends up costing time and money. Smart, intuitive claims management workflows that take advantage of automation technology can augment staff resources and reduce the likelihood of errors. Automation contributes to clean and accurate claims the first time around. According to the Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH), manual processing can take an average of four minutes per claim. Automation cuts this time by 25%, bringing the total time per claim down to just three minutes. This might not seem like a lot in isolation; however, it becomes more material when the time savings is applied to a large, multi-hospital health system that partnered with Experian Health to revamp its claims processes. The health system gets through 200,000 claims per month. That could translate into 200,000 minutes saved – or more than 3,300 hours – every 30 days. Amidst the staffing shortages that are persistent in healthcare, those numbers are significant. For providers of all sizes, the right automation tools use an expansive library of national payer edits, supplemented by custom edits, to ensure that claims are clean before they get out the door. These tools can also organize and prioritize accounts to help staff members use their time most efficiently. If a claim does have an issue, organizations can use additional technologies to stay one step ahead of the denials process. Enhanced claim status monitoring can give providers insight into potential problems long before the ERA and Explanation of Benefits are processed. This allows organizations to address known issues and predict their revenue cycle outcomes earlier and more accurately. Automation can also help providers slash even more time off the claims management process. The Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH) estimates that it takes between 14 and 30 minutes to complete a manual claims status inquiry. Automated status monitoring can potentially shave 9 minutes off this task, freeing up staff to complete other tasks. There’s still plenty of options when claims do get denied. Providers can complement their claims capabilities with denials workflow management tools that can generate customized worklists, highlight ANSI reason codes and payer proprietary codes, and identify payer-specific denial trends to help inform decision-making. Automation creates a faster, more accurate claims processing ecosystem Most healthcare organizations use a number of different technologies to manage their revenue cycles, and all these systems must work together in harmony. Unfortunately, interoperability across disparate clinical and financial systems isn’t easy to achieve. In the case of the provider that chose Experian Health to improve its claims process, integration with Epic, its medical records system of choice, was very important. For example, ClaimSource easily loaded customized edits and the edits library into Epic, tracked and corrected claims, and found and repaired issues with the system build, creating opportunities for cross-training and centralized reporting. Thanks to this automated, integrated process, this provider improved its acceptance rate by 10 percent, consistently seeing 99 percent of its claims accepted. Additionally, its clean, paid claims percentage increased by over 10 percent, creating a more predictable, profitable revenue cycle. With denials on the rise in an increasingly challenging claims management environment, providers will benefit from replacing manual processes wherever possible. Automation is the key to optimizing staff resources and significantly reducing reimbursement obstacles. To see sustained success with your revenue cycle, get in touch with Experian Health and start automating your claims process today.
In the sixth article in our series on how the patient journey has evolved since the onset of COVID-19, we look at three ways to prevent claim denials and reduce the time to payment. Faster claims processing is at the heart of a better patient financial experience and reduces revenue leakage for providers. For more insights and strategic recommendations to improve the patient journey in 2021 and beyond, download the full white paper. Nearly seven in 10 healthcare leaders say claim denials have increased in 2021, with an average denial rate of 17%. Inefficient claims processing and claims management systems were already struggling, but the pressures of the pandemic are causing even more rejections. Vaccination programs, rescheduled electives, and residency relocations contributed to fluctuating patient volumes, putting extra strain on reimbursement workflows. Patients switching health plans, and missing codes for COVID-19 vaccinations and treatment caused further delays and errors. Payer rules for reimbursement of treatment for “Long Covid” remain unclear: the absence of research and standards means claims are rejected because there’s no agreed “medical necessity.” Slow processes, incorrect patient identities, and poor data management mean the upward trend in claim denials seen over the last five years shows that it is likely to continue. Denials create a fragmented experience for patients because they don’t know how much they’ll need to pay for care, and leaves providers battling to recoup revenue. An effective claims management system is critical for maintaining provider revenue, securing patient reimbursements, and promoting positive patient-provider relationships. Here, we recommend a three-part strategy that uses data and automation to get claims right the first time. Prevention is better than cure One of the primary frustrations for claims management teams is that the majority of denied claims are preventable. Many of the errors that trigger denials could be avoided if databases and records systems could talk to each other. Instead of a reactive response, providers should invest in tools that can proactively prevent mistakes and errors, to ensure they collect every dollar owed. Digital tools can analyze data to help providers weed out the vulnerabilities in their processes and keep up with payer changes. Incorporating such tools is a sensible first step toward reducing and recovering expenses. One option is ClaimSource, which helps ensure that all hospital and physician claims are clean before being submitted to a government or commercial payer. It unlocks access to extensive federal, state, and commercial payer edits, allows custom provider edits, and incorporates automation tools and customer support. Providers can become confident that their claims will be correct the first time. Improving the likelihood of approval is critical to provider profitability and makes for a smoother patient experience. Prioritize eligibility checks for cleaner claims the first time Experian Health’s revenue cycle management experts say that the number one reason for denials is inaccurate eligibility. A 2020 poll by the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) backs this up: 42% of providers said inaccurate or incomplete prior authorizations were a top cause of denials. Most providers use a medical claims clearinghouse or have systems to check eligibility beforehand. However, if patient identities aren’t verified properly at every touchpoint in the healthcare journey, mistakes can creep in and cause confusion about eligibility. Similarly, if the patient needs additional treatment that isn’t covered in the initial authorization, the resulting mismatch could lead to a denial. Tools such as Prior Authorizations and Insurance Eligibility Verification can help providers validate patient coverage in under 30 seconds. These solutions integrate with ClaimSource to fill in the gaps of patient information and streamline the claims process. Patients will get better insights into what they owe, and providers can increase efficiency. Automate workflows to eliminate time-consuming errors with claims processing Providers are well aware that manual processing slows reimbursement and increases the risk of errors. Tools such as Prior Authorizations and Insurance Eligibility Verification can help by using data and automation to improve accuracy and efficiency. The Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare suggests that automation can shave 20% off claims processing times, which could translate to thousands of hours saved each month. With those extra hours, claims teams will be freed up to complete their lengthy to-do lists and focus their efforts on other priorities. In addition, automated workflows can help assign work to the right specialist, keep track of payer changes, and incorporate repeated identity verification checks to drive down denials. With a Denial Workflow Manager, providers can automate and optimize their entire denial management process to get real-time insights on denied claims. This system can eliminate manual reviews and quickly identify accounts for resubmission or appeal. It can be integrated with tools such as ClaimSource and Enhanced Claim Status, so providers can monitor claims, denials and remits on the same screen and accelerate the workflow. As the pandemic continues to pressure profits and patients come to expect more from their healthcare journey, it’s no longer reasonable to accept denials as a cost of doing business. To find out how Experian Health can help your organization reduce denials, recover pandemic losses, and improve the patient experience, contact our team today. Missed the other blogs in the series? Check them out: 4 data driven healthcare marketing strategies to re-engage patients after COVID-19 How 24/7 self-scheduling can improve the post-pandemic patient experience COVID-19 highlights an acute need for digital patient intake solutions Automated prior authorization: getting patients the approved care they need Getting a holistic picture of patients with social determinants of health
Consumer-led care hit its stride during the pandemic. COVID-19 unlocked healthcare’s digital front door, giving patients more control over how and when they schedule and manage appointments. Unfortunately, while digital patient access has made navigating the healthcare system more convenient and flexible in many ways, consumers are discovering that one of the more frustrating aspects of the healthcare experience has failed to keep pace with scheduling, payments and other digital advances: registration. Waiting rooms. Paperwork. Misplaced insurance cards. Confusing copays. More paperwork! A hassle before the pandemic, registration has become even more challenging for staff and patients in the context of “contactless care.” With more patients starting to come back through the door as a result of vaccination programs and rescheduled elective procedures, there’s an opportunity for providers to smooth out the kinks in the registration experience. Vaccine “hesitancy” has exposed wider issues in patient registration Headlines suggest that large numbers of patients are fearful of being vaccinated against COVID-19. But dig a little deeper, and the issue is more complex. Many patients do want to be vaccinated, but struggle to navigate complicated registration websites, and therefore aren’t showing up for their shot. The Kaiser Family Foundation reported in January that two thirds of patients were unsure of how to access the vaccine. The high volume of patients having trouble getting the information they need is shining a light into the dark corners of the registration process, where improvements have long been needed. Improving the patient registration process isn’t just a pandemic problem While it’s true that COVID-19 is driving the push for online patient registration, improving the overall experience offers wider, longer-term benefits to patients and providers: A convenient and consumer-friendly registration experience Online registration is easier, faster and simpler for patients. With 73% of consumers saying they want to manage their healthcare admin through patient portals, convenient self-service solutions are a trend that’s here to stay. (Find out more about consumer attitudes to patient access in Experian Health’s Patient Access Survey.) More accurate patient data and fewer duplicate records When consumers are the ones responsible for entering their patient information, and when they can do it in a time and place that suits them best, that data is far more likely to be accurate. Not only does this create a better patient intake experience, it also reduces the risk of patient identity errors and duplicate records. With a text-to-mobile registration tool, patients can begin the process with one click, and then easily verify and edit information to make sure their records are up to date and correct. Operational efficiencies and better claims recovery Beyond the customer experience, improved registration can reduce the risk of denied claims, because the data is processed more accurately and quickly, and can be automatically verified against comprehensive datasets. Patients can also choose to pay copay amounts upfront through online registration tools, which makes bad debt far less likely, and improves the overall revenue flow. Safer and smoother registration during flu season COVID-19 put unprecedented pressure on registration processes. But more streamlined systems with remote, mobile-friendly registration tools will make a typical flu season more bearable for patient access staff and patients too. Patients and staff have suffered through cumbersome registration processes for years. Perhaps one unforeseen benefit of the COVID-19 pandemic is that the days of sitting in busy waiting rooms, filling out multiple forms, will be a thing of the past? Discover how Experian Health’s patient intake solutions could help your patient access department create a registration experience that matches today’s consumer expectations.
Product featured in this article: Coverage Discovery As of the end of March 2021, more than 53 million Americans have been fully vaccinated, allowing for cautious optimism as we prepare for the next phase of the COVID-19 journey. Unfortunately for pharmacists, the vaccination program has compounded many of the challenges of the last 12 months. Shots may be free to patients, but someone has to pay for them – and getting reimbursed is proving to be a major pain. Complicated billing processes, extra billing audits and mountains of extra paperwork, rejected claims and slow payments are not exclusive to pharmacies helping vaccinate America. With the coronavirus pandemic continuing to muddy the insurance landscape, getting hold of missing dollars is challenging. Healthcare reimbursements haven’t been straightforward for other providers either: widespread coverage loss and uncompensated care is putting extra strain on hospital revenue cycles. With the coronavirus pandemic continuing to muddy the insurance landscape, getting hold of missing dollars is challenging. Providers must find ways to quickly and accurately determine each patient’s coverage status to minimize bad debt. Navigating the complex world of post-COVID healthcare coverage What does the reimbursement landscape look like, one year on? After a long wait, elective procedures are back. But the surge in patient volumes means providers must be on their toes to keep track of coverage. The process for doing so must be streamlined and precise. Ramping up capacity to verify and check coverage without burdensome paperwork is a must. Patient intake is under pressure. More patients are coming through the doors as a result of elective services and vaccination programs (though not always to their usual facility). COVID-19 hasn’t gone away, and with pockets of infection spikes, safety remains a top priority. Capturing adequate insurance information in this context is no mean feat. Running automated coverage checks as soon as the patient arrives will minimize face-to-face contact during admissions and avoid delays. Patient access and collections staff are overburdened. Manual checks are difficult when staff are operating remotely or in a socially distanced environment, and patient information might be incomplete. Automated self-pay scrubbing can help handle the volume. A tool with built-in reporting can also offer insights on workflow and productivity, to help spot opportunities for quicker claims processing. New digital healthcare technologies aren’t always covered by insurers. Telehealth, a life raft during COVID-19, tends to be covered less often by private insurers, compared to Medicare and Medicaid. Coverage checks must factor this in to avoid errors and wasted time. Providers should opt for tools that sweep for payer updates to telehealth coverage to avoid unnecessary delays or denials. Employment levels may be inching upwards again, but tracking coverage remains a challenge as patients start new jobs with new health plans. In addition, checking for Medicare coverage in the midst of changing codes and protocols is time consuming and confusing. A third-party resource such as Coverage Discovery can look for all coverage options and make sure the right bill goes to the right payer. Find missing dollars with Coverage Discovery Hospitals, pharmacists and other healthcare providers can’t afford to continue losing money at a time when every dollar is needed to prepare for “after COVID-19.” Experian Health’s Coverage Discovery is a proven system for tracking down missing coverage quickly and easily, to avoid unnecessary revenue loss. Using billions of data assets and intelligent confidence scoring, it combs through multiple government and commercial payer accounts to maximize actionable coverage. Staff can trust the outputs and focus their attention where it’s really needed. By making coverage identification more efficient and accurate, it’s a shot in the arm for providers in need of faster reimbursements. Contact us to see how Coverage Discovery can be easily integrated into your revenue cycle, so you can maximize reimbursements over the coming weeks and months.
Many thought the end of COVID-19 was in sight with the availability of a vaccine, and while that is somewhat true, an entirely new set of issues has arrived: how to properly administer and manage the vaccine. Now that a COVID-19 vaccine is approved and underway, providers need to execute a medical billing and coding strategy to sustain vaccination efforts. We interviewed J. Scott Milne, senior director of product management at Experian Health, about what’s changed and what providers can do to prepare. How can providers ensure that vaccine administration codes are billed correctly? The ICD-10 and CPT codes for the COVID-19 vaccine haven’t existed until now, which means providers have a new set of codes to learn and unfortunately, those codes seem to change or update almost daily. As more vaccines are introduced, more codes are also introduced, and not just for the vaccine as a whole, but for each specific dose of the vaccine. For example, dose one of the Pfizer vaccine will have a code that differs entirely from dose two of the Moderna vaccine. Keeping up with these changes isn’t only difficult for provider staff, who are likely already stretched thin, but they certainly don’t want to run the risk of submitting a claim with incorrect information. The errors are what result in denials or undercharges. A solution like Claim Scrubber ensures code sets are current on a daily basis – a necessity for times like these – but applies an extensive set of general and payer-specific edits before preparing the claim for processing. That means claims for vaccine administration are error-free before submission to the payer or clearinghouse. Providers can eliminate undercharges, boost first-time pass through rates and do away with costly, time-consuming rework. But proper coding is only the first piece of the billing puzzle. The second piece is to verify the accuracy of payment received from third-party payers. How can providers ensure that third party payers will reimburse at the contracted rates? Providers can certainly get reimbursed for administering the vaccine, but there are a lot of moving parts to keep up with. For example, both Medicaid and Medicare will reimburse providers for administering COVID-19 vaccines, but the percentage of what is covered will differ by carrier and the reimbursement rates can vary both by state and type of arrangement. Reimbursement rates will also vary amongst private payers. Then there is the variation in reimbursement based on vaccine type and dosage -- vaccines that require a single dose may be reimbursed at a rate different than those that require two doses. Even without the vaccine rollout underway it can be a headache for hospitals and health systems to manage multiple payer contracts and reimbursement methodologies. A solution like Contract Manager will pinpoint variance in reimbursement quickly and easily, accurately pricing claims and comparing actual allowed amounts to expected amounts. It is a tool built to adapt to changes within the industry, so providers can capitalize on emerging reimbursement schemes and changes in payer payment policies. It can also help identify sources and patterns of errors so recurring issues can be promptly resolved. The end result: the provider organization can the payer revenue that is due for vaccine administration. Interested in learning more about how providers can optimize vaccine-related reimbursements? Other blog posts in this series: Segmenting your patient population for the COVID-19 vaccine Engaging patient segments with convenient, secure scheduling solutions Authenticating portal access with automation Optimizing reimbursements by capturing missing coverage